Reply to Anonymous 8:25 AM

-------- Your tax dollars at work ---------

Dear Anon 8:25:

Interesting you should mention MOS lawyer.... I understand that one former Councillor indicated that MOS had been advised by one of MOS' lawyers that the Base was beneficially owned by MOS. When I asked the new CAO Mr. Cox ..... I was told that the MOS lawyer had advised MOS that they were not the beneficial owners of the base. Clear as mud isn't it?!?

Given the documentation I've seen.... and Mr. Cox's letter of July 13, 2009, if MOS was a beneficial owner of the base, I believe it was solely in its capacity as a member of the SWSDA and the benefical ownership was therefore shared by all the members of the SWSDA Board.... in my humble opinion.......

Ed